So I first saw this one several years ago but a recent news article brought it back into my mind and I thought I would re-visit it and see if my opinions on it had changed. They did.
In the late 80s and early 90s there were a rash of child molestation cases hitting the news. For many of them, accusations of Satanic ritual abuse (see the McMartin preschool case) followed. And for most of them, the abuse accusations came to light when the alleged victim(s) were put under hypnosis.
Such was the case with the latter when it came to Arnold Friedman and his teenage son, Jesse. Children who took Arnold's computer classes in the basement of the family's home on Long Island were questioned extensively after some child pornography was discovered in Arnold's possession.
The kids were subsequently put under hypnosis and alleged they were raped and molested by the two men over the course of several months.
Father and son claimed their innocence. That is, until further questioning of Arnold revealed that he had indeed molested "a few" boys over the course of his lifetime. But
not, he insisted, any of the children making the current claims.
Under the circumstances, and to save his son from a life in prison, Arnold agreed to plead guilty to the crimes and was sentenced to prison.
Jesse, who maintained his innocence, was found guilty anyway and sentenced to prison(he has since served his term and been released).
The first time I watched this film I was horrified at how poorly the investigation was conducted and how with nothing more than the word of some scared children an entire family's lives could be ruined (not only were father and son affected but also the mother and the two elder sons). The archival footage filmed by the family themselves allows us to watch the family fall apart right before our eyes.
Upon a second viewing, I felt these same feelings of horror but added to that a feeling of disgust. Arnold never shows any signs of remorse-- not for the children (neither those he molested nor those who accused him currently) and certainly not for his own family. The closest thing we ever see to a guilty conscience is when, after he is imprisoned, he commits suicide leaving the money from his life insurance to Jesse as the sole heir.
And even after two screenings, I cannot determine whether or not Jesse is innocent. At one point in the legal proceedings he claims his father abused him and he only participated in the abuse due to his fear and guilt over the abuse. At another point, he claims to have only voiced the abuse story in order to make a more sympathetic case to the jury. So was he lying then? Or is he lying now?
I recommend watching this riveting documentary with others and discussing the above. Ten years later, I am still scratching my head.
Watch for free at SnagFilms :
Capturing the Friedmans